They said the finance ministry received around 189,000 applications under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme) 2019, which kicked off in September and concluded on January 15.
“The government had set a target of 184,000 taxpayers with tax collection of over Rs 35,000 crore. However, with the extension of the scheme (from the initial deadline of December 31), around 5,000 more applications were filed,” said an official. “The initial response to the scheme was tepid, but it subsequently picked up. We can safely say that it’s a successful scheme and the figures are more than our conservative estimates were.”
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman had unveiled the scheme in the budget for 2019-20, with an aim to assist taxpayers in clearing the baggage of disputes under legacy taxes (service tax and central excise), which are subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST).
State-run and private companies that settled their cases under the scheme include the State Bank of India (SBI), Kellogg’s, GTL Infrastructure and Maharashtra’s City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), according to the people cited earlier.
While SBI and CIDCO paid taxes of more than Rs 100 crore apiece, GTL Infrastructure paid Rs 55 crore, Kellogg’s paid Rs 35 crore and Tops Security paid Rs 30 crore.
Mumbai’s central GST unit received over 10% of the total applications. Of the 20,450 applications it received, 6,650 were litigation cases, 7,200 pertained to arrears, 4,700 were of voluntary disclosures and in nearly 1,900 cases audit was required.
“Mumbai managed to collect Rs 7,700 crore in taxes. Of this, Rs 5,500 crore was adjustment of pre-deposits and Rs 2,200 crore was the fresh amount paid,” said an official.
Four types of disputes could be settled under the scheme, the official said. First, litigation cases, where the matter was pending under litigation either at first adjudication level or at some appellate level. Second, arrears cases, where the matter had attained finality but the dues to government had yet to be recovered. Third, investigation or audit cases, where the amount was quantified but a show-cause notice had yet to be issued. Besides, there were declaration cases, where a fresh case of non-payment or short payment was to be declared subject to certain conditions.
In the case of Kellogg’s, the company was classifying its product Chocos under chapter 19 of the Central Excise Tariff with a lower rate of duty, whereas the Central Excise Department contented that it contained chocolate beyond a threshold percentage. “Given this it is more appropriately classified under chapter 18 of tariff, with a higher rate of duty. The dispute was pending before the tribunal. Kellogg’s settled the dispute by opting for the scheme and paying Rs 35 crore to the government,” said a third official.
Emailed queries sent by ET to the SBI and Kellogg’s remained unanswered until press time on Wednesday. GTL declined to comment on the matter.
In the case of GTL, an official said, section 66E (e) of Finance Act, 1994 stipulates that agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act is a ‘declared service’ and it is taxable.
“Collection of damages or any amount by a company from the client company for any shortfall of supply/contract is a declared service. Aircel did not honour the contract with GTL for hiring a certain number of telecom towers and consequently had to pay a certain amount to GTL, which settled its service tax liability on such amount by opting for the scheme and paying Rs 55 crore,” said the official.